sometimes amid the research, you have to pause

After a good productive, not yet-over-weekend of work, thinking about conviviality along with antagonism – this speaks loudly to me.

Optimistic little poem
by Hans Magnus Enzensberger (transl. by David Constatine) from ‘New Poems on the Underground’ edited by Gerard Benson, Judith Chernaik and Cicely Herbert

Now and then it happens
that somebody shouts for help
and somebody else jumps in at once
and absolutely gratis.

Here in the thick of the grossest capitalism
round the corner comes the shining fire brigade
and extinguishes, or suddenly
there’s silver in the beggar’s hat.

Mornings the streets are full
of people hurrying here and there without
daggers in their hands, quite equably
after milk or radishes.

As though in a time of deepest peace.

A splendid sight.

The next screening will take place in Leeds

This will be a free small screening of the film ‘Jeremy Delller’s Battle of Orgreave’ on the evening of Thursday 24 May from 7pm at Wharf Chambers, Leeds

Are you interested in getting involved with a focus group to give me feedback on the Jeremy Deller/Mike Figgis/Channel 4/Artangel film of the re-enactment of the battle between striking miners and police during the 1984-85 miners strike?

A small screening will be held at Wharf Chambers from 7pm – 8pm and a focus group meeting will be held after this for around 45 minutes.  Refreshments will be provided.  There will be the possibility to join a focus group to talk to me about your experience.  Attendees will be encouraged to fill in questionnaires, either at the event or online. Attendance of the event itself is free, but Wharf Chambers is a members’ club and you need to be a member, or guest of a member, in order to attend.  To join, please visit wharfchambers.org.  Membership costs £1 and requires a minimum of 48 hours to take effect.

Tickets available through Event Brite.  If you don’t manage to get one of the public tickets through Event Brite – you could always see the film by being a member of the focus group. Email me for more details of the focus group.

Next step: focus groups & questionnaires on Deller and Miller

I’ve finally been given the green light to get the next batch of screenings under way.  Leeds University Ethics Committee approved my qualitative research.  It looks like the first focus group will be held at Wharf Chambers.  If you’re interested in that small free screening – I’ll be promoting the event shortly, so drop me a line and I’ll keep you up to date directly.

I’ve also been able to get my questionnaires up and they are now live through the Bristol Surveys Online system.

If you’ve been involved in anyway in these events, please do fill in the appropriate questionnaires, even if you do fancy getting involved in a focus group at a later date.  Your experiences are crucial to understanding how these artworks affect people.

The show that has emerged from my walking practice

(Image – ‘The Changeling’ – © Sarah Wishart 2012)

Deep in Hackney one night, discussing my route home from work, (as Londoners are want to do) I mentioned to a friend that I cycled most nights through London Fields in East London.  His response surprised me.  He said that a girlfriend living close to the park had warned him, never to walk through it alone, let alone at night.  When I pressed him as to why she felt this – he was unable to provide any anecdotal evidence to back up her fears.  Nothing had ever happened to her or anyone she knew.  The Here be Monsters project emerged from my interest in places that have a similarly (potentially unwarranted) dangerous reputation.  I asked a cross section of colleagues to suggest the London spaces they considered dangerous. Many of the resulting spaces were bustling with different cultures and classes, and included Hackney, Brixton and the area around the Elephant & Castle.  These suggestions can be seen to be uncovering the fear/threat of the other who is silently, and perhaps always already, raced. The process revealed geographies of fear and inscribed imagined monsters within these maps. It suggested once again that there is an assumption that the unknown space (the crucially other-ed space) is something to be terrified of.

This geography of fear resonates with me.  I was a participating artist with the DIY III project funded by the Live Art Development Agency and Artsadmin, the culmination of two days work-shopping in Toynbee Studios, led by Mark Hunter.  This project, as with all the DIY projects, aims to stimulate artists into making work through different inspirations and methodologies.  Hunter’s project directed all participants out into London to deliberately get lost.  I partially recorded my journey with a mini-disc and was amazed to discover how much of the journey was coloured by my ebbing and flowing sense of fear.  Along a desolate and vulnerable stretch of the Thames, my breath rans ragged and short.  Much later, (after I’d broken the minidisc fumbling for its controls again when nervous because I was walking in an unknown area of Lewisham), when I finally reached my destination of Nunhead cemetery, I was absolutely convinced I was about to be murdered by a stranger I saw lurking in the undergrowth.  Dee Heddon spoke about her research on ‘Performing Forests’ at PSi#14 in Copenhagen in 2008 and her discussion on fear resonated with my experience and made me want to explore it within an urban setting further.  This has also been fed by my being attacked by a man with a razor blade in London Fields in summer 2008.  The space no longer had an unwarranted dangerous reputation for me, yet more than ever, I now wanted to find the ways in which I might ‘unfrighten’ the space.

Although photography is the main focus of Here Be Monsters the process behind the work is framed within the walking practice of a woman in a city.  In order to find the subjects for these large format photographs, I devised walks through areas of London from some of the locations suggested to me in my discussions, and would find that I’d often walk through two or three suggested areas in the course of one walk.  The walks were documented in three ways.

The first aim and method was common to all three – documentation by photography.  I used a medium format half frame camera, which enabled me to catalogue each walk thoroughly.  My initial methodology for the photographs was to take a photo every single time I felt anxious or fearful.  From these photos I then applied the larger remit of the Here Be Monsters show in choosing which ones become large-scale format photos.

The second form of documentation was by sound recording of the walk.  My two choices were to either record the whole walk and edit post-production stage, or to make a decision about when the recordings will start and stop.  I aimed to try each method out on a separate walk.

The third form of documentation will be the written responses to place formed through analysis of Nan Shepherd’s The Living Mountain.  From analysis of this text, I will formulate a methodology of response to the urban space, as Shepherd has done to the Grampian subject of this book.  Concerned with attempting to share her experiences of solitary exploration of this range of Scottish mountains through language, I attempt to break down her methodology and mirror it within the experiences of a solitary exploration of an area of London.

Pre-experiment walk.

In October 2008, I set out to walk from Hackney through London Fields, along the Regents Canal, over the top of the tunnel under Angel, through the backstreets of Angel back onto the canal, through Kings Cross and straight through the centre of London over Waterloo Bridge, through the Cut, down to the Elephant and Castle.  A walk of approximately 9 miles and took 7 hours.  As I didn’t know the area, fellow Here Be Monsters artist Nick Middleton accompanied me.  I took photos along the way at points I thought I might have felt nervous being alone.  The walk was exhausting and we discovered some really interesting locations along the way that might well have made for great large-format shots for the HBM show.  However, the practice felt false.  I wasn’t taking shots of moments or spaces where I was anxious – but rather ones where I thought I might feel anxious. The longer the day went on and the more we moved into familiar spaces, the less I felt the photos were relevant.  This experience though flagged up the need for a thought through methodology and the necessity to walk alone.  I decided I’d need to do the walk again, alone, which I did in June

Thoughts on the practice

It does seem a strange thing to do when I’m such an anxious person anyway to actually set out to scare myself repeatedly over a walk. My writing on this practice over the next six months as we try and get the show together, will try and contextualise this practice and alongside that attempt to be objective on the practice and the experience, and as a way to document this walking practice, all materials will be uploaded here and investigated further. Although this is not necessarily at this stage, a feminist performance – gender looks to be playing a significant role in my experience and in the experiential event of the city. Nan Shepherd’s experience of the Caingorms was a deeply sensual one – she was ‘a fierce looker’ and swam in lochs, ate produce scrubbed from the land – and lived up in the mountains for long periods of time. Whilst I want to absorb Shepherd’s methods of looking and experiencing – the city lived through the body will be a different exchange. Robert Macfarlane‘s article on Shepherd in the Guardian in August 2008 expands further on this idea;

It is Shepherd’s belief in what might be called “bodily thinking” that gives The Living Mountain its contemporary relevance. For more and more of us experience less and less contact with the world. We have increasingly to forget that our minds are shaped by the bodily experience of being in the world – its spaces, textures, sounds, smells and habits – as well by genetic traits we inherit and ideologies we absorb. We are, literally, losing touch”.

Getting on with it…

The forms are completed and submitted to the ethics review committee, all freshly signed by my supervisor and hopefully it won’t take too much longer than a couple of weeks to get the green light.  Once that happens, I can officially start the focus groups.  I had wanted to show the film at the Open Space Project in Leeds, but they’ve now closed as their funding had come to an end.  They have said that they’ll still be doing one-off events, and the film might be able to be shown at one of those.  In the meantime I’ll be approaching the West Yorkshire Playhouse Hey Days group.  They’d already confirmed that they liked the idea, so will just need to clear it with my contact there.

I’ve a couple of weeks off work, so am determined to use this time and get stuck into both the administration aspect of the qualitative research as well as getting some serious words on paper.

I’ve submitted an overview and chapter breakdown to Steve, my supervisor and we’ll discuss it after Easter but it would be great to have a chunk of work for him to read as well.  I’ve laboured long with insecurity about the project, and its time to recognise that as a form of procrastination.  Time to get on with it.  As my good friend Deborah Youdell has told me repeatedly. ‘This will not be the last nor the best piece of research you ever do, get it finished’.  This is the beginning of the end – and its going to be a great year.

I’ve discovered some forums talking about films based in Sheffield and will be following up on those once I’ve done some work on my website/blog.  I had feedback from some of the miners who attended the screening with Red Ladder that it was difficult finding contact details for me.  So I want to make things simple and pull everything into the one site, but its not the most straightforward of processes.  When I tire of reading and writing this week, I’ll work on the website.  Having a range of tasks is key to avoiding my old enemy, ‘Faffing about worrying’.

I’m off to London next week to see the new hatchlings and the not so new hatchlings of friends and to see the Deller show at the Hayward and the Keiller show at the Tate.  Then I’m also going to be seeing Bill Drummond in Sheffield.  I’ve just read ‘K Foundation Burn a Million Quid‘ so really looking forward to meeting him.  My friend, the artist Nicholas Middleton, is a huge fan of Drummond’s work, so I’m very familiar with him, but to go on a walk with him, I just know its going to kickstart my yearning to get back into making my own art through walking practice again.  Hopefully not a distraction from the research!

Afterthoughts: The screening – pt. 2

Ok – so we were all ready to go – to screen Jeremy Deller’s ‘Battle of Orgreave’ at the City Varieties.  We’ve had the green light from the council – and David Douglass, Phill Jupitus, Boff Whalley and myself all set to do a Q&A after the screening.  The DVD had been run through its paces to ensure it all worked with the systems at The City Varieties. I had friends visiting up from London, Nicholas Middleton who has been one of my PhD’s biggest supporters, and his girlfriend, the artist Tana West.  Due to a little tiny bit of a late night the night before, I was very nervous during the Saturday of the screening.  I was due to introduce the film and then there’d be a Q&A afterwards.  Red Ladder had done their matinée performance of ‘Big Society’ and Boff and Phill were extremely generous to contribute to the screening event before going back on-stage to do the evening show.

The show had ostensibly ‘sold out’ although it was a free event, tickets had been distributed out so much that they opened the balcony for a few people.  The theatre wasn’t full, perhaps as a result of it being a free event people were more likely to pull out at the last-minute as they hadn’t spent out on it, but numbers were great nevertheless.

In the end, I didn’t get an opportunity to introduce the film and it just rolled without introduction.  But it actually didn’t need any – which is kind of what I was going to say in my intro.  It was absolutely wonderful to see it on the big screen and to feel the responses of a big audience in the dark around me.  There were laughs and jeers at a number of moments but most significantly when the statement from the BBC came up, (This is an apology for ‘inadvertently reversing the occurrence of events’ in the news footage of the original event, which depicted police responding to a miners attack when in reality the opposite was true – that the police charged the miners and the miners responded).  This provoked a huge intake of breath and shocked sounds.  Or at least that’s what it sounded like it did to me.  It did not feel like a furious response but a shocked one.

Following the screening – we went up on stage and Rod Dixon, director of Red Ladder started us off by talking about my experience with Leeds City Council.  I can’t really remember all the issues I raised when I spoke, but certainly all nerves had vanished (as per usual) the minute I got on-stage.  I did mention the gasp at the BBC statement, and how I’d made a presumption that the film would be well-known in this area due to its proclivity to Sheffield and because so many of my comparable circle in London, activists, anarchists, Marxists, academics, artists and theatre makers, know it well.  So I was constantly surprised when people kept telling me that they’d never seen it before.  I raised this and a member of the audience, very involved with events at Orgreave, responded with assertions that my subjective experience was limited as the film was well-known.  Anecdotally, that’s not been the case for me – but as a result of the screening – I’ve been pushed to some forums and sites about Orgreave and Sheffield that I haven’t come across before, and should be able to start talking to more involved people than I’ve come across to date.  The feedback from a lot of the audience in the theatre and afterwards in the bar was also one of not coming across it before. However, it also flagged that if I suggested the work was not well-known in its own country (so to speak) that this could be read as a presumption on my part.  I was interested in the fact that my immediate reaction to this idea was to authenticate my own interest in this piece, (I found myself doing just this in an interview with Gethyn Pugh when a question about a perceived perspective on the groups in London that know this film was raised) but I want to resist that response because it suggests that you must have a significant level of ownership and investment in the political story in order to engage with it and that goes against the essence of the piece to me.

There is still a lot I want to do in trying to understand EXACTLY how the event on the day went.  The film shows one thing but in a sense, it has almost negated the need for any other form of documentation on this live art event.  The film is the first stop for anyone wanting to think about the event and for years I myself have muddled the two things up.  The film inevitably leaves things out and inevitably inserts things that did not feature in the re-enactment.  This is not a criticism of the film. It is a fantastic thing. It gives fullness to proceedings by having the talking head shots for example, but I need to remember that those things did not contribute to the event on the day. I do want to keep on trying to find original audiences for the event.  The event was created through narratives, and first-hand narratives are the best way to understand what happened on the day.

With that in mind, I want to acknowledge that I chose not to involve questionnaires at the City Varieties for a couple of reasons – firstly was practical – the ethical review committee at Leeds hadn’t signed them off yet, (mainly as I hadn’t submitted them yet!) And the second reason was also practical (even if I had submitted them – I think I still would have opted for this) – with such a large number watching the show and with such a tight turnaround before needing to get out ahead of the evening show – the questionnaires would have mostly been lost.  The screening was important in terms of showing the work in such a great space, in such a great context of accompanying the ‘Big Society’ show, to be able to pull so many people in and to learn lessons about screening it, and starting to talk to affected people about it.  What was clear was that I really needed to ensure the potential for being emotionally affected by the film is built into the ethical review because the screening did evoke a number of emotions in the audience.  I was extremely honoured to have a number of miners attend, none who had been involved in the re-enactment but a good number had been at Orgreave.  Their stories, and the stories of their children who stood up in the theatre and testified to the extent of the influence of this event seemed significant. Some miners told me of a buried anger that was flared by the experience of seeing the film in the bar after.  One man was moved to tears momentarily whilst talking to me over a drink.  Yet one thing was similar – whether people were directly or indirectly affected, the piece provoked story-telling from them. The Q&A wasn’t so much of a traditional question and answer session, but more of a testimonial.  It seemed to begin as a conversation between the panel and the audience more than I’ve seen usually at academic conferences, but then people began to tell their story as linked to the event/film etc. This is something I want to pursue, and feel like I need to return to my questionnaires ahead of submitting them.  So I’m actually pleased I didn’t manage to get them in ahead of the screening.

I was encouraged by a lot of people to continue with wide-spread screenings including some calls for me to try to get these into schools!  However, I need to ensure that all future efforts with screening have focus groups attached to them.  It’s great to bring the film to new audiences but as I work full-time alongside doing this PhD – I need to ensure that my efforts are focussed. I have screenings in the pipeline at the Open Space in Leeds, theoretically at the West Yorkshire Playhouse with the Hey Days group, and in London.  I would very much like to show it in Sheffield as I think I’d be more likely to encounter original audience members of the re-enactment that way.  I got a lot of enthusiasm about doing this extra screening from the Leeds experience and have received promises of help from theatre companies and organisations in Sheffield to realise this.  Its going to be a busy year but very exciting!

Afterthoughts: The screening – pt. 1 – The Council

The screening was really a wonderful success – all the irritating admin stuff that drove me and Red Ladder mad in the weeks running up to the screening got sorted.  Jane Verity, the PR Manager with Red Ladder and myself had to attend a meeting with the Council to discuss a certificate for the film.  This had been confusing as to why it was needed because the film was never released for cinemas, but instead broadcast on Channel 4, on Sunday 20 October 2002. 

Nevertheless after discussions with the BBFC – it seemed like City Varieties needed to clear it as it was linked to their licence.  Jane and I thought we’d be attending a general information meeting about it – but when we arrived it transpired that we were actually attending a licensing meeting in front of the legal and media departments of the council.  This was a bit nerve-wracking as I hadn’t prepared for such an application and wasn’t sure what it would entail.  I hate going to meetings unprepared!  We were asked to sit in an ante-chamber at the council building in Leeds and were called in.  I’d had to bring the DVD in case anyone wanted to watch it.  Whilst skimming it the night before, I’d realised there was perhaps more swearing than I’d recalled and worried that this would impact badly on this meeting. I suspected anxieties about the language and violence in the event would make up the majority of the concerns about the screening of the film.  I had no idea what the outcome would be.

As anticipated, the panel, (made up of the licensing committee’s legal panel, a ‘clerk’ (horrible job title – almost as bad as administrator’s hangover – ‘secretary’) and three councillors), were concerned with swearing and violence.  Our first interaction with the council had requested an overview of the film, I’d written one for them, and from that, that contact had suggested a ‘U’.  However now I found myself in the surreal position of having to give a rough estimate of the swear words in the film.  ‘Well there were about five fucks, a number of shits, a scattering of bastards and some bloodys’ – it did feel like a scene from a Monty Python film – in this huge council room with everyone with exceptionally serious faces.

However, it was quickly obvious that in fact the panel were more concerned about the shots of violence in the film.  I was quizzed as to whether there was any original footage, to which I explained all the original images from the original events were stills.  I explained that the re-enactment footage was clearly signposted as being a performance by having ‘re-enactment’ flashed at the bottom of the screen whenever the shots were in the midst of the action.  I was asked if there were any significant moments of violence that would upset people – I said that not in terms of people thinking someone was getting hurt.  It was clear that this was a staged performance.  I was asked if there was any blood.  I said no, its a reenactment.  I was asked if any animals were hurt during filming.  I said no. I was asked if there were direct shots of miners fighting with police – to which I replied, ‘yes, as it occured in the original event, and is being re-enacted here’.

One of the councillors then said ‘the thing is, we’re concerned that in the wake of the London riots, whether this film might encourage young people to riot against police?’ I reiterated my point about this being a re-enactment, and was originally shown on television as part of the news, that was seen by a young Jeremy Deller and inspired him to make this piece of art.  I said that I doubted it would have the sort of effect that the councillors were suggesting.  I did not say what I was thinking which was if this piece of art had that effect, then I’d have to rip up my PhD thinking and start again, because they clearly had more faith in art being that efficacious than I did.  If I had said this – it would have been facetious of course, but there’s a truth in it too.  I was almost moved that they had more faith in its reception than I did.

I told this story in the days before the screening, and at the Q&A session, it was referred to a couple of times – the councillor’s suggestion about how the film is one that implies a fear about how things are received by audiences, and also implies some level of potential censorship (i.e. if it provokes violence – we might restrict its viewing).  However, this anecdote is only half told.  After I’d finished responding to the councillors’ questions, the legal team suggested that rather than my suggestion of a U, the film should rather be classified as a 15.  I said that I’d not ever expected it to be classified as ‘U’ but felt that a ’15′ wasn’t necessary, that a ‘PG’ would be more appropriate.  At this, all three Councillors were visibly satisfied.  One even started packing up his paperwork. The legal team appeared to push for a ’15′, but significantly the Councillor who had made the comment about the film’s potential efficacy, said ‘No.  A PG is fine.  It needs to be seen.  The story needs to be heard, from both sides’.  So in fact, rather than the Council having a nervous take on the politics espoused in the film, they felt it was a necessary and important screening, and any nerves were soothed by imposing a ‘Parental Guidance’ on the film.

More about the screening soon!

Free Screening of Jeremy Deller’s The Battle of Orgreave’ with special guests Phill Jupitus, Boff Whalley and David Douglass

28 January 2012 5.30pm – 7.00pm – in association with Red Ladder, City Varieties Music Hall & Artangel

As part of the run of Red Ladder’s ‘Big Society! A Music Hall Comedy’, there will a free screening of Jeremy Deller’s ‘The Battle of Orgreave’ at City Varieties Music Hall in Leeds on 28 January 2012.  Tickets for this free event are available through the City Varieties box office.

‘The Battle of Orgreave’ is the Mike Figgis film of the re-enactment of a pitch battle between striking miners and police at the Sheffield colliery Orgreave during the 1984-5 miners strike. The re-enactment was drawn from painstaking detail created from testimonies Deller and Artangel collated from those involved on the day as well as original footage. It was enacted by a mix of re-enactment societies (more used to re-enacting period pieces) local people from Orgreave and Sheffield and original participants from both sides of the battle.

This screening is part of the research carried out by Leeds University’s Sarah Wishart who is researching how political art affects audiences. The screening will be followed by a Q&A session led by Sarah Wishart with special guests Phill Jupitus, Boff Whalley, (writer of ‘The Big Society’ ) and David Douglass (NUM rep at Orgreave, key participant in the film and re-enactment advisor). The floor will then be opened up to audience members. In addition, Wishart is also looking to raise the profile of this
event in order to find the original audience members, who were there at the original re-enactment – about their memories of the day and how it affected them. If you attended the original performance event as an audience member or performer – then Sarah would love to hear from you.

This screening is sandwiched between the matinee and evening performance of ‘The Big Society’ – and is a wonderful opportunity to catch a fantastic show alongside this film.  Tickets for this, and every other performance of ‘The Big Society’ are also available from the box office.  Tickets are selling fast so make sure you don’t miss out.

Big Society
Crash-landing loudly into the rambunctious world of Edwardian Music Hall, ‘Big Society’ follows the on- and off-stage exploits of the cast of a Music Hall variety show. It’s 1910 and the cast are fighting for survival, threatened with shock/horror disclosures by a corrupt and moralistic newspaper, ‘The Double Standard’. Trapped between an elitist, public-schooled government and a two-faced, mercenary press, the performers grapple to justify their existence and hold onto their jobs – that is, until Eve, escapologist and mistress to King Edward VII, decides to take things into her own hands. Written by Chumbawamba founder member and guitarist, Boff Whalley, the show opens at The City Varieties Music Hall in Leeds in January 2012, the show features the band performing twelve new songs, alongside the cast of the show. The show also stars comedian Phill Jupitus in the title role of George Lightfeather.

For further information about the research and the screening, please contact Sarah Wishart

For information about the ‘Big Society’, contact Jane Verity, Press and PR Manager
Red Ladder Theatre Company
3 St Peter’s Buildings, York Street, Leeds LS9 8AJ
Telephone: 0113 245 5311 Mobile: 07854 759 480
Email: jane@redladder.co.uk Twitter: @redladdertheatr,
www.redladder.co.uk

copyright and screening rights

The admin is really ramping up.  However, with over 15 years administration experience, it feels brilliant to be pulling in these other skills into my PhD.  I’m writing copious emails to organisations, trying to arrange times for focus groups, with one eye on the schedule for next year, and one eye on what needs to happen in what order.  The vague idea I had right at the start of my move to Leeds, to get in touch with Sheffield schools to screen the film ‘The Battle of Orgreave’ to sixth form level History students, looked like it was going to be difficult without contacts in Sheffield schools.  It wasn’t impossible, I have contacts at the Institute of Education and could have followed it up, but my supervisor suggested some other paths.  I’ve one of these other paths yet to confirm, so I’ll leave that for a later post – but in essence, I’ve very tentatively confirmed that we will be showing the film to the following groups:

  • West Yorkshire Playhouse Hey Days group (Feb 2012 tbc)
  • Red Ladder Theatre Group writers group (2012 tbc)
  • Audience at City Varieties as part of Red Ladder’s ‘Big Society’ (Jan 2012 tbc)

Even though these events are nowhere near finalised, there’s still a ton of admin to do ahead any organisation of the events themselves. Firstly I needed to get the sign off to use the film itself.  Sometimes there are glorious happy serendipitous glitches.  For example, I didn’t realise that Artangel held the screening copyright for The Battle of Orgreave.  This meant that I contacted Jeremy Deller, Mike Figgis and Channel 4 first.  Bar from getting final final sign off from Channel 4, everyone seemed very happy with the prospect.  The Performing Rights Society pursue aggressively the rights of performers – and rightly so in my opinion, but as a result, I didn’t want to get caught out in any way.  Therefore I continued to follow up my early query with Artangel and finally they confirmed that Channel 4 own the broadcasting rights, whereas Artangel own the screening rights.  I was very glad that I’d contacted Artangel last, because I think that because Jeremy Deller and Mike Figgis had already given their blessing to the project, it totally sped up Artangel’s decision to give me the go-ahead with this project.  If you’re interested in seeing the film and giving your feedback to my project – then keep posted – more will follow about the ‘Big Society’ collaboration in due course!

ethics

Just started talking to the department and the Leeds Humanities Research Institute to find out if there’s anything I need to think about in terms of putting the qualitative research stuff together.  Turns out I need to put together a full ethical review – and it can take about six weeks, so really glad I found that out now rather than as I was approaching returning officially to the department after my time off (to just let my poor brain have a bit of a nap – emotional car crash having smashed up my ability to be organised, together, logical or function at any intellectual, emotional or practical level really).

It promises to be a bit of a nightmare I anticipate but as I’m trying to be positive about everything at the moment – the more forms I get my head round – the better I prepare myself for all the funding applications that hopefully lie in my future!

And the upshot will be getting the official go ahead to get into some very exciting research activity potentially in the new year.

Looks like my summer and now autumn insomnia might be useful to all this work – including my Nanowrimo project – I was up at 545 this morning and was in the pool by 7am.  If I can start to get to the gym by 630am – I’ll get all my exercise done in the dead time that I have just been lying there whilst stupid ideas and musings float around my head.  Leaving the evenings for work.

I am now determined to get a first draft of my PhD done by Christmas 2012.  And equally determined to continue writing fiction alongside it.